|
Bhartrhari's paradox is the title of a 1981 paper by Hans and Radhika Herzberger〔Herzberger, Hans and Radhika Herzberger (1981). "Bhartrhari's Paradox" Journal of Indian Philosophy 9: 1-17 (slightly revised version of "Bhartrhari's Paradox" in Studies in Indian Philosophy. A memorial volume in honour of pandit Sukhlalji Sanghvi. (L.D. Series 84.) Gen. ed. Dalsukh Malvania et al. Amedabad, 1981).〕 which drew attention to the discussion of self-referential paradoxes in the work ''Vākyapadīya'' attributed to Bhartṛhari, an Indian grammarian of the 5th century. In the chapter dealing with logical and linguistic relations, the ''Sambandha-samuddeśa'', Bhartrhari discusses several statements of a paradoxical nature, including ''sarvam mithyā bravīmi'' "everything I am saying is false" which belongs to the liar paradox family, as well as the paradox arising from the statement that something is unnameable or unsignifiable (in Sanskrit: ''avācya''): this becomes nameable or signifiable precisely by calling it unnameable or unsignifiable. Bhartrhari's interest lies not in strengthening this and other paradoxes by abstracting them from pragmatic context, but rather in exploring how a stubborn paradox may arise from unproblematic situations in daily communication. An unproblematic situation of communication is turned into a paradox — we have either contradiction (''virodha'') or infinite regress (''anavasthā'') — when abstraction is made from the functisignification and its extension in time, by accepting a simultaneous, opposite function (''apara vyāpāra'') undoing the previous one.〔Jan E.M. Houben, "Paradoxe et perspectivisme dans la philosophie de langage de Bhartrhari: langage, pensée et réalité", ''Bulletin d'Études Indiennes'' 19 (2001):173-199. www.academia.edu/6169499/〕 For Bhartrhari it is important to analyse and solve the unsignifiability paradox because he holds that what cannot be signified may nevertheless be indicated (''vyapadiśyate'') and it may be understood (''pratīyate'') to exist. ==Notes== *B. K. Matilal, 1990, The Word and the World: India's Contribution to the Study of Language. Delhi: Oxford University Press. p. 129-130. *Hemanta Kumar Ganguli, "Theory of Logical Construction and Solution of some Logical Paradoxes" , appendix to ''Philosophy of Logical Construction: An Examination of Logical Atomism and Logical Positivism in the light of the Philosophies of Bhartrhari, Dharmakirti and Prajnakaragupta'', Calcutta, 1963. *Jan E.M. Houben, ''The Sambandha-samuddeśa (chapter on relation) and Bhartrhari's philosophy of language'', Gonda Indological Series, 2. Groningen: Egbert Forsten, 1995, pp. 213-219. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Bhartrhari's paradox」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|